Education Centre 
  
Russell Investment Approach 
  
Expert Insights 
  
Market Perspective by Ernie Ankrim 
  
Article Library 
Mutual Funds 
Stocks & Bonds 
Investment Strategies 
Market Analysis 
Diversification & Risk 
Measuring Performance 
International Investing 
  
Life Events 
  
Working with an Investment Professional 
Russell.com Home



Weighing Performance
Part 2: Where Do Small Caps Fit?

By Russell Investment Group
Global Leaders in Multi-Manager Investing
November 25, 2003

The swift elevation gain of the US stock market in 2003 has witnessed small companies mightily outperform their large-cap brethren. Through the end of the third quarter, the Russell 2000® Index of small-cap issues was ahead 28.58% for the year, nearly double the large-cap Russell 1000® (15.70%).

This comes after the two were separated by less than 2% in the red in 2002 with the Russell 1000 down 21.65% and Russell 2000 giving up 20.48% for the year.

Historical returns have exhibited small-cap leadership in recovery phases and 2003 certainly backs up the pattern. Since small caps can be less liquid, demand sometimes pushes prices up faster than larger stocks as investor expectations rise. Stretched out over time, small caps are more volatile as well, as their limited diversification compared to large caps, leads to stronger tide changes.

"Small companies often focus on just a single product," says Russell Research Analyst Tom Warburton. "They also tend to have significant operating leverage, intensive fixed costs and lower variable costs, which leads to more substantial improvements in earnings when demand begins to recover."

Breaking the Mold
While small-caps leading a recovery is not surprising, the fact that 2003 may become the fifth consecutive year of leadership for small caps is.

    Russell 1000® Index (Large)   Russell 2000® Index (Small)
2002   -21.65%   -20.48%
2001   -12.45%   2.49%
2000   -7.79%   -3.02%
1999   20.91%   21.26%

Small caps maintaining their edge during the three-year bear market, when more defensive, blue chip stocks might have been expected to fare better, furthers the assertion that over or underweighting certain styles may create more risk than an investor is comfortable with.

"Recent history has taught us a valuable lesson why a market-oriented asset allocation of equities makes good sense," Warburton said.

In 1989 and 1990, large caps, as represented by the Russell 1000, substantially outperformed small caps (Russell 2000) in down markets. From 1991 to 1993, small caps led the way during recovery. Then large caps pulled ahead from 1994 through 1998 during a period of sustained growth.

"There's an important lesson here," Warburton says. "That phrase about past performance not being an indication of future results isn't just a legality. It's a fact of life. No asset class or style behaves in a consistent, predictable pattern, so it's very difficult for investors to make forecasts by looking backward. Rules get broken frequently."

As attractive as small-cap performance currently is, risk tolerance for a more volatile asset must be considered when rebalancing a portfolio. Small-cap stocks make up approximately 8% of the broad-market Russell 3000® Index. Only investors who are interested in increasing the risk of their portfolio may be comfortable with overweighting small caps.

Maintaining Perspective
With signs increasingly pointing to a growing US economy, investors have been optimistic. But today's world still presents dangers in the multiple shadows of global corporate, economic and geopolitical issues.

"Asset allocation and diversification remain the keys," says Warburton. Whether investors have stayed in the market or are just coming back, diversifying assets among capitalization tiers — as well as equity styles — continues to make sense.

Of course, holding small-cap stocks in proportion to their market representation can't halt the ups and downs of the economy and the market. "But, it can prevent the consequences of guesswork," Warburton said.

History does demonstrate one thing. Patience and discipline offer most investors the best tools for reaching their goals over time.

The data source for all small-cap information in this article is the Russell 2000 Index.

The data source for all large-cap information in this article is the Russell 1000 Index.




Copyright© Frank Russell Company 2003. All rights reserved. See Important Legal Information. Date of first use: November 25, 2003.

This is a publication of our parent, Frank Russell Company. It should not be construed as investment, legal, or tax advice. The contents are for general information purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own investment, legal, or tax advisor concerning your own situation and any specific investment questions you may have. For further information about these contents, please contact Frank Russel Canada Limited.

Diversification does not assure a profit or guarantee against loss in declining markets.

As with any type of portfolio structuring, attempting to reduce risk and increase return could, at certain times, unintentionally reduce returns. Rebalancing your portfolio may create tax consequences on the taxable portion.

Small company issues are subject to considerable price fluctuations and are more volatile than large company stocks. Small cap funds may involve considerably more risk than funds investing in larger-cap companies.

Russell 1000® Value Index: Measures the performance of those Russell 1000® Index securities with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values, representative of US securities exhibiting value characteristics.

Russell 1000® Growth Index: Measures the performance of those Russell 1000® Index securities with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values, representative of US securities exhibiting growth characteristics.

Russell 2000® Growth Index: Measures the performance of those Russell 2000® Index securities with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values, representative of US securities exhibiting growth characteristics.

Russell 2000® Value Index: Measures the performance of those Russell 2000® Index securities with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values, representative of US securities exhibiting value characteristics.

Russell 3000® Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000® Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values, representative of US securities exhibiting growth characteristics.

Russell 3000® Value Index: Measures the performance of those Russell 3000® Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values, representative of US securities exhibiting value characteristics.

Frank Russell Company is the owner of the trademarks and copyrights related to its indexes.

Indexes and/or benchmarks are unmanaged and cannot be invested in directly. Returns represent past performance, are not a guarantee of future performance, and are not indicative of any specific investment.

RC 3399


 

Related ARTICLE
Weighing Performance — Part 1: How Much of Your Assets Should Go into Growh Stocks?
 

INVEST with Russell
Learn more about Russell's Sovereign® Investment Program or LifePoints® Portfolios, and institutional funds.
 

 

More Market ANALYSIS
Review previously published articles
 

Why MULTI-MANAGER?
Learn the benefits of Russell's investment approach.


Printer friendly version of this page
Send feedback or comments
Site Search


Products and services described on these websites are intended for Canadian residents only. Information on these sites should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security to any person. Persons outside Canada may find more information about products and services available within their jurisdictions by going to Russell's worldwide site, http://www.russell.com.

Legal Information    Privacy Policy     Required Sales Disclosure

© Russell Investments Canada Limited 2008. All Rights Reserved.